According to data from OpenSea and CoinMarketCap, the current floor price for one Labubu NFT is significantly lower than the value of one Bitcoin (BTC), with Labubu typically trading in the range of several hundred to a few thousand USD, while Bitcoin remains above $60,000 as of June 2024 (sources: OpenSea, CoinMarketCap). For traders, Bitcoin (BTC) offers far greater liquidity, global exchange support, and established price history, while Labubu NFTs are subject to higher volatility, lower liquidity, and niche demand (source: OpenSea). Therefore, from a trading perspective, Bitcoin (BTC) is a more liquid and widely accepted asset, whereas Labubu NFTs may appeal to collectors seeking unique digital assets but carry higher risk and less predictable market behavior.

According to @thedaoofwei, there is renewed interest in Oni NFTs as collectors consider acquiring them over other assets, highlighted in a June 1, 2025 tweet (source: https://twitter.com/thedaoofwei/status/1929128526118093073). This signals increased trading activity and potential liquidity for Oni NFTs on secondary markets like OpenSea. Traders are watching Oni floor prices and transaction volumes, as spikes in interest could correlate with broader NFT and Ethereum market movements. Monitoring Oni-related wallets and sales data may provide actionable insights for cryptocurrency traders seeking short-term opportunities.

According to KookCapitalLLC, Pudgy Penguin profile pictures (PFPs) have now surpassed Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC) PFPs in popularity within the crypto community, signaling a shift in NFT trading trends and user sentiment (source: twitter.com/KookCapitalLLC/status/1916473287149814049). This trend may influence liquidity and floor price movement for both collections, with Pudgy Penguins gaining traction among traders and collectors. Monitoring trading volume and social sentiment around these NFT projects is recommended for anticipating potential short to mid-term price volatility.

According to @LeonidasNFT, a critical metric for evaluating whether an NFT mint was a rug pull involves analyzing what percentage of the funds have been reinvested to provide utility to token holders. If after a year, a minimal percentage of funds have been allocated to enhance holder benefits, it may indicate a potential extraction or rug pull scenario.